Куда я попал?
SECURITM это SGRC система, ? автоматизирующая процессы в службах информационной безопасности. SECURITM помогает построить и управлять ИСПДн, КИИ, ГИС, СМИБ/СУИБ, банковскими системами защиты.
А еще SECURITM это место для обмена опытом и наработками для служб безопасности.

CVE-2024-46787

PUBLISHED 04.05.2025

CNA: Linux

userfaultfd: fix checks for huge PMDs

Обновлено: 04.05.2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: userfaultfd: fix checks for huge PMDs Patch series "userfaultfd: fix races around pmd_trans_huge() check", v2. The pmd_trans_huge() code in mfill_atomic() is wrong in three different ways depending on kernel version: 1. The pmd_trans_huge() check is racy and can lead to a BUG_ON() (if you hit the right two race windows) - I've tested this in a kernel build with some extra mdelay() calls. See the commit message for a description of the race scenario. On older kernels (before 6.5), I think the same bug can even theoretically lead to accessing transhuge page contents as a page table if you hit the right 5 narrow race windows (I haven't tested this case). 2. As pointed out by Qi Zheng, pmd_trans_huge() is not sufficient for detecting PMDs that don't point to page tables. On older kernels (before 6.5), you'd just have to win a single fairly wide race to hit this. I've tested this on 6.1 stable by racing migration (with a mdelay() patched into try_to_migrate()) against UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE - on my x86 VM, that causes a kernel oops in ptlock_ptr(). 3. On newer kernels (>=6.5), for shmem mappings, khugepaged is allowed to yank page tables out from under us (though I haven't tested that), so I think the BUG_ON() checks in mfill_atomic() are just wrong. I decided to write two separate fixes for these (one fix for bugs 1+2, one fix for bug 3), so that the first fix can be backported to kernels affected by bugs 1+2. This patch (of 2): This fixes two issues. I discovered that the following race can occur: mfill_atomic other thread ============ ============ <zap PMD> pmdp_get_lockless() [reads none pmd] <bail if trans_huge> <if none:> <pagefault creates transhuge zeropage> __pte_alloc [no-op] <zap PMD> <bail if pmd_trans_huge(*dst_pmd)> BUG_ON(pmd_none(*dst_pmd)) I have experimentally verified this in a kernel with extra mdelay() calls; the BUG_ON(pmd_none(*dst_pmd)) triggers. On kernels newer than commit 0d940a9b270b ("mm/pgtable: allow pte_offset_map[_lock]() to fail"), this can't lead to anything worse than a BUG_ON(), since the page table access helpers are actually designed to deal with page tables concurrently disappearing; but on older kernels (<=6.4), I think we could probably theoretically race past the two BUG_ON() checks and end up treating a hugepage as a page table. The second issue is that, as Qi Zheng pointed out, there are other types of huge PMDs that pmd_trans_huge() can't catch: devmap PMDs and swap PMDs (in particular, migration PMDs). On <=6.4, this is worse than the first issue: If mfill_atomic() runs on a PMD that contains a migration entry (which just requires winning a single, fairly wide race), it will pass the PMD to pte_offset_map_lock(), which assumes that the PMD points to a page table. Breakage follows: First, the kernel tries to take the PTE lock (which will crash or maybe worse if there is no "struct page" for the address bits in the migration entry PMD - I think at least on X86 there usually is no corresponding "struct page" thanks to the PTE inversion mitigation, amd64 looks different). If that didn't crash, the kernel would next try to write a PTE into what it wrongly thinks is a page table. As part of fixing these issues, get rid of the check for pmd_trans_huge() before __pte_alloc() - that's redundant, we're going to have to check for that after the __pte_alloc() anyway. Backport note: pmdp_get_lockless() is pmd_read_atomic() in older kernels.

БДУ ФСТЭК

Идентификатор Описание
BDU:2025-15047 Уязвимость функции mfill_atomic() модуля mm/userfaultfd.c подсистемы управления памятью ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

Доп. Информация

Product Status

Linux
Product: Linux
Vendor: Linux
Default status: unaffected
Версии:
Затронутые версии Статус
Наблюдалось в версиях от c1a4de99fada21e2e9251e52cbb51eff5aadc757 до 3c6b4bcf37845c9359aed926324bed66bdd2448d affected
Наблюдалось в версиях от c1a4de99fada21e2e9251e52cbb51eff5aadc757 до 98cc18b1b71e23fe81a5194ed432b20c2d81a01a affected
Наблюдалось в версиях от c1a4de99fada21e2e9251e52cbb51eff5aadc757 до 71c186efc1b2cf1aeabfeff3b9bd5ac4c5ac14d8 affected
Linux
Product: Linux
Vendor: Linux
Default status: affected
Версии:
Затронутые версии Статус
Наблюдалось в версии 4.3 affected
Наблюдалось в версиях от 0 до 4.3 unaffected
Наблюдалось до версии 6.6.* unaffected
Наблюдалось до версии 6.10.* unaffected
Наблюдалось до версии * unaffected
 

Ссылки

CISA ADP Vulnrichment

Обновлено: 29.09.2024
Этот блок содержит дополнительную информацию, предоставленную программой CVE для этой уязвимости.

SSVC

Exploitation Automatable Technical Impact Версия Дата доступа
none no partial 2.0.3 29.09.2024

Мы используем cookie-файлы, чтобы получить статистику, которая помогает нам улучшить сервис для вас с целью персонализации сервисов и предложений. Вы может прочитать подробнее о cookie-файлах или изменить настройки браузера. Продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы даёте согласие на использование ваших cookie-файлов и соглашаетесь с Политикой обработки персональных данных.