Куда я попал?
SECURITM это SGRC система, ? автоматизирующая процессы в службах информационной безопасности. SECURITM помогает построить и управлять ИСПДн, КИИ, ГИС, СМИБ/СУИБ, банковскими системами защиты.
А еще SECURITM это место для обмена опытом и наработками для служб безопасности.

CVE-2026-43194

PUBLISHED 11.05.2026

CNA: Linux

net: consume xmit errors of GSO frames

Обновлено: 11.05.2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: consume xmit errors of GSO frames udpgro_frglist.sh and udpgro_bench.sh are the flakiest tests currently in NIPA. They fail in the same exact way, TCP GRO test stalls occasionally and the test gets killed after 10min. These tests use veth to simulate GRO. They attach a trivial ("return XDP_PASS;") XDP program to the veth to force TSO off and NAPI on. Digging into the failure mode we can see that the connection is completely stuck after a burst of drops. The sender's snd_nxt is at sequence number N [1], but the receiver claims to have received (rcv_nxt) up to N + 3 * MSS [2]. Last piece of the puzzle is that senders rtx queue is not empty (let's say the block in the rtx queue is at sequence number N - 4 * MSS [3]). In this state, sender sends a retransmission from the rtx queue with a single segment, and sequence numbers N-4*MSS:N-3*MSS [3]. Receiver sees it and responds with an ACK all the way up to N + 3 * MSS [2]. But sender will reject this ack as TCP_ACK_UNSENT_DATA because it has no recollection of ever sending data that far out [1]. And we are stuck. The root cause is the mess of the xmit return codes. veth returns an error when it can't xmit a frame. We end up with a loss event like this: ------------------------------------------------- | GSO super frame 1 | GSO super frame 2 | |-----------------------------------------------| | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ------------------------------------------------- x ok ok <ok>| ok ok ok <x> \\ snd_nxt "x" means packet lost by veth, and "ok" means it went thru. Since veth has TSO disabled in this test it sees individual segments. Segment 1 is on the retransmit queue and will be resent. So why did the sender not advance snd_nxt even tho it clearly did send up to seg 8? tcp_write_xmit() interprets the return code from the core to mean that data has not been sent at all. Since TCP deals with GSO super frames, not individual segment the crux of the problem is that loss of a single segment can be interpreted as loss of all. TCP only sees the last return code for the last segment of the GSO frame (in <> brackets in the diagram above). Of course for the problem to occur we need a setup or a device without a Qdisc. Otherwise Qdisc layer disconnects the protocol layer from the device errors completely. We have multiple ways to fix this. 1) make veth not return an error when it lost a packet. While this is what I think we did in the past, the issue keeps reappearing and it's annoying to debug. The game of whack a mole is not great. 2) fix the damn return codes We only talk about NETDEV_TX_OK and NETDEV_TX_BUSY in the documentation, so maybe we should make the return code from ndo_start_xmit() a boolean. I like that the most, but perhaps some ancient, not-really-networking protocol would suffer. 3) make TCP ignore the errors It is not entirely clear to me what benefit TCP gets from interpreting the result of ip_queue_xmit()? Specifically once the connection is established and we're pushing data - packet loss is just packet loss? 4) this fix Ignore the rc in the Qdisc-less+GSO case, since it's unreliable. We already always return OK in the TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS case. In the Qdisc-less case let's be a bit more conservative and only mask the GSO errors. This path is taken by non-IP-"networks" like CAN, MCTP etc, so we could regress some ancient thing. This is the simplest, but also maybe the hackiest fix? Similar fix has been proposed by Eric in the past but never committed because original reporter was working with an OOT driver and wasn't providing feedback (see Link).

БДУ ФСТЭК

Идентификатор Описание
BDU:2026-08416 Уязвимость функции tcp_write_xmit() ядра операционных систем Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

CVSS

Оценка Severity Версия Базовый вектор
7.5 HIGH 3.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Доп. Информация

Product Status

Linux
Product: Linux
Vendor: Linux
Default status: unaffected
Версии:
Затронутые версии Статус
Наблюдалось в версиях от 1f59533f9ca5634e7b8914252e48aee9d9cbe501 до ae3f627b45fbc3c776a4e484696f3cad7cbb4eca affected
Наблюдалось в версиях от 1f59533f9ca5634e7b8914252e48aee9d9cbe501 до 0c9de092ef8c50a7ee9612811566f0aa81d8d7b6 affected
Наблюдалось в версиях от 1f59533f9ca5634e7b8914252e48aee9d9cbe501 до 56bd32c0edca34041a5c215887fcf562fae2e2db affected
Наблюдалось в версиях от 1f59533f9ca5634e7b8914252e48aee9d9cbe501 до 9ac6aebef4b4bfc5ed408b0b65645981574bc780 affected
Наблюдалось в версиях от 1f59533f9ca5634e7b8914252e48aee9d9cbe501 до ea5d7787635e26ec1194ec7eec0e8e5ae3bd10a5 affected
Наблюдалось в версиях от 1f59533f9ca5634e7b8914252e48aee9d9cbe501 до 4cb163e9efcac4cd35c3043e097f25081a5c015c affected
Наблюдалось в версиях от 1f59533f9ca5634e7b8914252e48aee9d9cbe501 до c86901d22c89a6bf4e2f013e948aaabc60869893 affected
Наблюдалось в версиях от 1f59533f9ca5634e7b8914252e48aee9d9cbe501 до 7aa767d0d3d04e50ae94e770db7db8197f666970 affected
Linux
Product: Linux
Vendor: Linux
Default status: affected
Версии:
Затронутые версии Статус
Наблюдалось в версии 3.18 affected
Наблюдалось в версиях от 0 до 3.18 unaffected
Наблюдалось до версии 5.10.* unaffected
Наблюдалось до версии 5.15.* unaffected
Наблюдалось до версии 6.1.* unaffected
Наблюдалось до версии 6.6.* unaffected
Наблюдалось до версии 6.12.* unaffected
Наблюдалось до версии 6.18.* unaffected
Наблюдалось до версии 6.19.* unaffected
Наблюдалось до версии * unaffected
 

Ссылки

Мы используем cookie-файлы, чтобы получить статистику, которая помогает нам улучшить сервис для вас с целью персонализации сервисов и предложений. Вы может прочитать подробнее о cookie-файлах или изменить настройки браузера. Продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы даёте согласие на использование ваших cookie-файлов и соглашаетесь с Политикой обработки персональных данных.