Куда я попал?
SECURITM это SGRC система, ? автоматизирующая процессы в службах информационной безопасности. SECURITM помогает построить и управлять ИСПДн, КИИ, ГИС, СМИБ/СУИБ, банковскими системами защиты.
А еще SECURITM это место для обмена опытом и наработками для служб безопасности.

Манипуляции с токенами доступа

Adversaries may modify access tokens to operate under a different user or system security context to perform actions and bypass access controls. Windows uses access tokens to determine the ownership of a running process. A user can manipulate access tokens to make a running process appear as though it is the child of a different process or belongs to someone other than the user that started the process. When this occurs, the process also takes on the security context associated with the new token. An adversary can use built-in Windows API functions to copy access tokens from existing processes; this is known as token stealing. These token can then be applied to an existing process (i.e. Token Impersonation/Theft) or used to spawn a new process (i.e. Create Process with Token). An adversary must already be in a privileged user context (i.e. administrator) to steal a token. However, adversaries commonly use token stealing to elevate their security context from the administrator level to the SYSTEM level. An adversary can then use a token to authenticate to a remote system as the account for that token if the account has appropriate permissions on the remote system.(Citation: Pentestlab Token Manipulation) Any standard user can use the runas command, and the Windows API functions, to create impersonation tokens; it does not require access to an administrator account. There are also other mechanisms, such as Active Directory fields, that can be used to modify access tokens.

ID: T1134
Суб-техники:  .001 .002 .003 .004 .005
Тактика(-и): Defense Evasion, Privilege Escalation
Платформы: Windows
Требуемые разрешения: Administrator, User
Источники данных: Active Directory: Active Directory Object Modification, Command: Command Execution, Process: OS API Execution, Process: Process Creation, Process: Process Metadata, User Account: User Account Metadata
Версия: 2.0
Дата создания: 14 Dec 2017
Последнее изменение: 03 May 2022

Примеры процедур

Название Описание
HermeticWiper

HermeticWiper can use `AdjustTokenPrivileges` to grant itself privileges for debugging with `SeDebugPrivilege`, creating backups with `SeBackupPrivilege`, loading drivers with `SeLoadDriverPrivilege`, and shutting down a local system with `SeShutdownPrivilege`.(Citation: Qualys Hermetic Wiper March 2022)(Citation: Crowdstrike DriveSlayer February 2022)

SUNSPOT

SUNSPOT modified its security token to grants itself debugging privileges by adding SeDebugPrivilege.(Citation: CrowdStrike SUNSPOT Implant January 2021)

PowerSploit

PowerSploit's Invoke-TokenManipulation Exfiltration module can be used to manipulate tokens.(Citation: GitHub PowerSploit May 2012)(Citation: PowerSploit Documentation)

AppleSeed

AppleSeed can gain system level privilege by passing SeDebugPrivilege to the AdjustTokenPrivilege API.(Citation: Malwarebytes Kimsuky June 2021)

Sliver

Sliver has the ability to manipulate user tokens on targeted Windows systems.(Citation: Bishop Fox Sliver Framework August 2019)(Citation: GitHub Sliver C2)

FIN6

FIN6 has used has used Metasploit’s named-pipe impersonation technique to escalate privileges.(Citation: FireEye FIN6 Apr 2019)

Blue Mockingbird

Blue Mockingbird has used JuicyPotato to abuse the SeImpersonate token privilege to escalate from web application pool accounts to NT Authority\SYSTEM.(Citation: RedCanary Mockingbird May 2020)

SslMM

SslMM contains a feature to manipulate process privileges and tokens.(Citation: Baumgartner Naikon 2015)

Duqu

Duqu examines running system processes for tokens that have specific system privileges. If it finds one, it will copy the token and store it for later use. Eventually it will start new processes with the stored token attached. It can also steal tokens to acquire administrative privileges.(Citation: Kaspersky Duqu 2.0)

Empire

Empire can use PowerSploit's Invoke-TokenManipulation to manipulate access tokens.(Citation: Github PowerShell Empire)

Gelsemium

Gelsemium can use token manipulation to bypass UAC on Windows7 systems.(Citation: ESET Gelsemium June 2021)

Cuba

Cuba has used SeDebugPrivilege and AdjustTokenPrivileges to elevate privileges.(Citation: McAfee Cuba April 2021)

PoshC2

PoshC2 can use Invoke-TokenManipulation for manipulating tokens.(Citation: GitHub PoshC2)

Hydraq

Hydraq creates a backdoor through which remote attackers can adjust token privileges.(Citation: Symantec Hydraq Jan 2010)

KillDisk

KillDisk has attempted to get the access token of a process by calling OpenProcessToken. If KillDisk gets the access token, then it attempt to modify the token privileges with AdjustTokenPrivileges.(Citation: Trend Micro KillDisk 2)

Ryuk

Ryuk has attempted to adjust its token privileges to have the SeDebugPrivilege.(Citation: CrowdStrike Ryuk January 2019)

MegaCortex

MegaCortex can enable SeDebugPrivilege and adjust token privileges.(Citation: IBM MegaCortex)

Контрмеры

Контрмера Описание
User Account Management

Manage the creation, modification, use, and permissions associated to user accounts.

Privileged Account Management

Manage the creation, modification, use, and permissions associated to privileged accounts, including SYSTEM and root.

Access Token Manipulation Mitigation

Access tokens are an integral part of the security system within Windows and cannot be turned off. However, an attacker must already have administrator level access on the local system to make full use of this technique; be sure to restrict users and accounts to the least privileges they require to do their job. Any user can also spoof access tokens if they have legitimate credentials. Follow mitigation guidelines for preventing adversary use of Valid Accounts. Limit permissions so that users and user groups cannot create tokens. This setting should be defined for the local system account only. GPO: Computer Configuration > [Policies] > Windows Settings > Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment: Create a token object. (Citation: Microsoft Create Token) Also define who can create a process level token to only the local and network service through GPO: Computer Configuration > [Policies] > Windows Settings > Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment: Replace a process level token. (Citation: Microsoft Replace Process Token) Also limit opportunities for adversaries to increase privileges by limiting Privilege Escalation opportunities.

Обнаружение

If an adversary is using a standard command-line shell, analysts can detect token manipulation by auditing command-line activity. Specifically, analysts should look for use of the runas command. Detailed command-line logging is not enabled by default in Windows.(Citation: Microsoft Command-line Logging) If an adversary is using a payload that calls the Windows token APIs directly, analysts can detect token manipulation only through careful analysis of user network activity, examination of running processes, and correlation with other endpoint and network behavior. There are many Windows API calls a payload can take advantage of to manipulate access tokens (e.g., LogonUser (Citation: Microsoft LogonUser), DuplicateTokenEx(Citation: Microsoft DuplicateTokenEx), and ImpersonateLoggedOnUser(Citation: Microsoft ImpersonateLoggedOnUser)). Please see the referenced Windows API pages for more information. Query systems for process and thread token information and look for inconsistencies such as user owns processes impersonating the local SYSTEM account.(Citation: BlackHat Atkinson Winchester Token Manipulation) Look for inconsistencies between the various fields that store PPID information, such as the EventHeader ProcessId from data collected via Event Tracing for Windows (ETW), Creator Process ID/Name from Windows event logs, and the ProcessID and ParentProcessID (which are also produced from ETW and other utilities such as Task Manager and Process Explorer). The ETW provided EventHeader ProcessId identifies the actual parent process.

Ссылки

  1. netbiosX. (2017, April 3). Token Manipulation. Retrieved April 21, 2017.
  2. Microsoft TechNet. (n.d.). Retrieved April 25, 2017.
  3. Microsoft TechNet. (n.d.). Retrieved April 25, 2017.
  4. Microsoft TechNet. (n.d.). Retrieved April 25, 2017.
  5. Mathers, B. (2017, March 7). Command line process auditing. Retrieved April 21, 2017.
  6. Atkinson, J., Winchester, R. (2017, December 7). A Process is No One: Hunting for Token Manipulation. Retrieved December 21, 2017.
  7. Dupuy, T. and Faou, M. (2021, June). Gelsemium. Retrieved November 30, 2021.
  8. BishopFox. (n.d.). Sliver. Retrieved September 15, 2021.
  9. Kervella, R. (2019, August 4). Cross-platform General Purpose Implant Framework Written in Golang. Retrieved July 30, 2021.
  10. Baumgartner, K., Golovkin, M.. (2015, May). The MsnMM Campaigns: The Earliest Naikon APT Campaigns. Retrieved April 10, 2019.
  11. Thomas, W. et al. (2022, February 25). CrowdStrike Falcon Protects from New Wiper Malware Used in Ukraine Cyberattacks. Retrieved March 25, 2022.
  12. Dani, M. (2022, March 1). Ukrainian Targets Hit by HermeticWiper, New Datawiper Malware. Retrieved March 25, 2022.
  13. Hanel, A. (2019, January 10). Big Game Hunting with Ryuk: Another Lucrative Targeted Ransomware. Retrieved May 12, 2020.
  14. Jazi, H. (2021, June 1). Kimsuky APT continues to target South Korean government using AppleSeed backdoor. Retrieved June 10, 2021.
  15. PowerSploit. (n.d.). PowerSploit. Retrieved February 6, 2018.
  16. PowerShellMafia. (2012, May 26). PowerSploit - A PowerShell Post-Exploitation Framework. Retrieved February 6, 2018.
  17. CrowdStrike Intelligence Team. (2021, January 11). SUNSPOT: An Implant in the Build Process. Retrieved January 11, 2021.
  18. Kaspersky Lab. (2015, June 11). The Duqu 2.0. Retrieved April 21, 2017.
  19. Nettitude. (2018, July 23). Python Server for PoshC2. Retrieved April 23, 2019.
  20. Lelli, A. (2010, January 11). Trojan.Hydraq. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
  21. Roccio, T., et al. (2021, April). Technical Analysis of Cuba Ransomware. Retrieved June 18, 2021.
  22. Lambert, T. (2020, May 7). Introducing Blue Mockingbird. Retrieved May 26, 2020.
  23. Gilbert Sison, Rheniel Ramos, Jay Yaneza, Alfredo Oliveira. (2018, January 15). KillDisk Variant Hits Latin American Financial Groups. Retrieved January 12, 2021.
  24. McKeague, B. et al. (2019, April 5). Pick-Six: Intercepting a FIN6 Intrusion, an Actor Recently Tied to Ryuk and LockerGoga Ransomware. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
  25. Del Fierro, C. Kessem, L.. (2020, January 8). From Mega to Giga: Cross-Version Comparison of Top MegaCortex Modifications. Retrieved February 15, 2021.
  26. Microsoft TechNet. (n.d.). Runas. Retrieved April 21, 2017.
  27. Brower, N., Lich, B. (2017, April 19). Replace a process level token. Retrieved December 19, 2017.
  28. Brower, N., Lich, B. (2017, April 19). Create a token object. Retrieved December 19, 2017.
  29. Schroeder, W., Warner, J., Nelson, M. (n.d.). Github PowerShellEmpire. Retrieved April 28, 2016.

Связанные риски

Ничего не найдено

Каталоги

Мы используем cookie-файлы, чтобы получить статистику, которая помогает нам улучшить сервис для вас с целью персонализации сервисов и предложений. Вы может прочитать подробнее о cookie-файлах или изменить настройки браузера. Продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы даёте согласие на использование ваших cookie-файлов и соглашаетесь с Политикой обработки персональных данных.